IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v12y2023i5p86-97.html

The influence of intensity of TikTok use, utilitarian value, and hedonic value on impulsive buying mediated by urge to buy impulsively

Author

Listed:
  • Vitria Zhuanita Rani

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia)

  • Ainur Rofiq

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia)

  • Himmiyatul Amanah Jiwa Juwita

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to find out whether there is a relationship between the intensity of using Tiktok, utilitarian value, hedonic value, and impulse buying. TikTok is a social commerce with a live shopping service that provides convenience in online shopping and allows direct interaction with sellers while browsing social media without switching applications. This study uses the stimulus-organism-response (SOR) theory, dividing the stimulus into internal and external factors. Internal factors include utilitarian value and hedonic value, while external factors are the intensity of use of the TikTok application. Respondents in this study are married women who use Tiktok. This research is causality research with a total sample of 120 respondents. The data collection method uses a questionnaire and is analyzed using SEM-PLS. The findings of this study indicate that the intensity of TikTok use significantly affects impulse purchases. However, utilitarian and hedonic values have no significant effect on impulse purchases. For the mediating effect, the impulse to buy impulsively mediates the relationship between the intensity of TikTok use and the hedonic value of impulse buying. However, it does not mediate the utilitarian value of impulse buying. Key Words: Intensity of TikTok Use, Utilitarian Value, and Hedonic Value, Impulsive Buying, Urge to Buy Impulsively, TikTok

Suggested Citation

  • Vitria Zhuanita Rani & Ainur Rofiq & Himmiyatul Amanah Jiwa Juwita, 2023. "The influence of intensity of TikTok use, utilitarian value, and hedonic value on impulsive buying mediated by urge to buy impulsively," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 12(5), pages 86-97, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:86-97
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i5.2690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/2690/1888
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i5.2690
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i5.2690?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Badgaiyan, Anant Jyoti & Verma, Anshul, 2014. "Intrinsic factors affecting impulsive buying behaviour—Evidence from India," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 537-549.
    2. Overby, Jeffrey W. & Lee, Eun-Ju, 2006. "The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(10-11), pages 1160-1166, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jebarajakirthy, Charles & Shankar, Amit, 2021. "Impact of online convenience on mobile banking adoption intention: A moderated mediation approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    2. Kim, Jeeyeon & Kim, Mingyung & Choi, Jeonghye & Trivedi, Minakshi, 2019. "Offline social interactions and online shopping demand: Does the degree of social interactions matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 373-381.
    3. Huber Gasinski & Barbara Szymoniuk & Magdalena Maciaszczyk & Maria Kocot & Janusz Sobon & Dominik Baldowski & Krzysztof Kandefer, 2026. "The Impact of Dark AI Patterns on Consumer Purchase Decisions and Impulsive Buying," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 490-499.
    4. Park, JungKun & Ahn, Jiseon & Thavisay, Toulany & Ren, Tianbao, 2019. "Examining the role of anxiety and social influence in multi-benefits of mobile payment service," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 140-149.
    5. Mahajan, Advitya Indu & Taggar, Rashi & Gupta, Suruchi, 2025. "Augmented reality in E-Commerce: A dual value and barrier-based perspective on Gen Z's satisfaction and AR-Integrated shopping behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    6. Trinh Le Tan & Khanh Nguyen Chau Ngoc & Hien Le Thi Thanh & Hoai Nguyen Thi Thu & Uyen Vo Truong Hoang, 2024. "Enhancing Repurchase Intention on Digital Platforms Based on Shopping Well-Being Through Shopping Value, Trust and Impulsive Buying," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    7. Lee, Jung Ick & Ren, Tianbao & Park, Jungkun, 2021. "Investigating travelers’ multi-impulse buying behavior in airport duty-free shopping for Chinese traveler: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Lee, Richard J. & Sener, Ipek N. & Mokhtarian, Patricia L. & Handy, Susan L., 2017. "Relationships between the online and in-store shopping frequency of Davis, California residents," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 40-52.
    9. Hsu, Sheila Hsuan-Yu & Tsou, Hung-Tai & Chen, Ja-Shen, 2021. "“Yes, we do. Why not use augmented reality?†customer responses to experiential presentations of AR-based applications," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    10. Canova, Luciano & Nicolini, Marcella, 2019. "Online price search across desktop and mobile devices: Evidence on cyberslacking and weather effects," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 32-39.
    11. Carlson, Jamie & Rahman, Mohammad M. & Taylor, Alexander & Voola, Ranjit, 2019. "Feel the VIBE: Examining value-in-the-brand-page-experience and its impact on satisfaction and customer engagement behaviours in mobile social media," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 149-162.
    12. Merle, Aurélie & St-Onge, Anik & Sénécal, Sylvain, 2022. "Does it pay to be honest? The effect of retailer-provided negative feedback on consumers’ product choice and shopping experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 532-543.
    13. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Quy & Vo, Nguyen S. & Su, Diep Ngoc & Nguyen, Vinh Hoang & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar, 2021. "What makes passengers continue using and talking positively about ride-hailing services? The role of the booking app and post-booking service quality," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 367-384.
    14. Hatice Doğan-Südaş & Ali Kara & Emre Karaca, 2023. "Effects of Gamified Mobile Apps on Purchase Intentions and Word-of-Mouth Engagement: Implications for Sustainability Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Kae Tran My Loan & Benjamin Chan Yin Fah & Behrang Samadi, 2015. "Exploring Customer Purchasing Intention over Online Store," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 5(5), pages 15-23, May.
    16. Shobeiri, Saeed & Laroche, Michel & Mazaheri, Ebrahim, 2013. "Shaping e-retailer’s website personality: The importance of experiential marketing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 102-110.
    17. Ren, Xiangming & Fu, Xiaorong & Luan, Rui & Bai, Lifei, 2025. "The impact of relationship strategy on customer engagement in paid membership programs," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    18. Muthaffar, Aisha & Vilches-Montero, Sonia, 2023. "Empowering retailers: A bounded rationality perspective to enhancing omnichannel journey satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    19. Yumei Luo & Qiongwei Ye, 2019. "Understanding Consumers’ Loyalty to an Online Outshopping Platform: The Role of Social Capital and Perceived Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Geuens, Maggie & De Pelsmacker, Patrick & Faseur, Tine, 2011. "Emotional advertising: Revisiting the role of product category," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 418-426, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:86-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.