IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v12y2023i3p216-230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of factors affecting interest in paying Zakat, Infaq, Sadaqa (ZIS) through e-wallets

Author

Listed:
  • Muhamad Abriyansyah

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia)

  • Ade Nur Rohim

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia)

Abstract

This study aims to identify the factors that influence the payment of ZIS through e-wallets in the Jabodetabek community. This research is a quantitative study. The study used primary data sources from a Likert scale questionnaire distributed to Muslims in the Jabodetabek community who have one of the following five e-wallets: GoPay, OVO, Shopee Pay, Dana, and LinkAja. The sample size in this study was 145 respondents, calculated using the Slovin formula. The data analysis methods used in this study include reliability tests, validity tests, classical assumption tests, and multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study show that, partially, religiosity has a negative and insignificant effect on the intention to pay ZIS through e-wallets. The variables of ease and trust have a significant positive effect on the intention to pay ZIS through e-wallets. When considered simultaneously, religiosity, ease, and trust have a significant effect on the intention to pay ZIS through e-wallets. Key Words:Zakat, Infaq, Sadaqa , E-wallets

Suggested Citation

  • Muhamad Abriyansyah & Ade Nur Rohim, 2023. "Analysis of factors affecting interest in paying Zakat, Infaq, Sadaqa (ZIS) through e-wallets," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 12(3), pages 216-230, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:216-230
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i3.2562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/2562/1777
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i3.2562
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i3.2562?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    zakat; infaq; sadaqa ; e-wallets;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:216-230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.