IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v12y2023i10p191-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A dual analysis study of classroom interactions in Japan and South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Roehl Sybing

    (Faculty of Global Communications, Doshisha University, 1-3 Tatara Miyakodani, Kyotanabe, Kyoto, Japan)

  • Tshimangadzo Selina Mudau

    (School of Nursing and Public Health, Nursing Department, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal, 238 Mazisi Kunene Rd, Glenwood, 4041, Durban, South Africa)

Abstract

The demands of raising education at a classroom level to international standards require a nuanced analytical lens involving multiple perspectives to contribute to the best practices. Most classroom research adopts a singular perspective, usually from researchers who are familiar with the nuances of the classroom context under study. In other words, published studies involving classroom observations are often analyzed by insiders who already have the insight to understand the situated dynamics of the classroom interactions they analyze. While this is an important analytical orientation, this stance may overlook important insights about teaching and learning that outsiders’ perspectives may be able to identify. The study employed a qualitative approach. Which was guided by the dialogic interactive theory. The methodological approach in Japan was face-to-face semi-structured interviews while in the South African context, virtual data generation methods were employed to interview teachers on the classroom interactions with students. The study population was English students, while in South Africa it was health course teachers who taught students from various health professions. A total of eight teachers were purposively recruited in South Africa with one student participant in Japan. Findings revealed similarities and differences in dialogic interactions and the interpretation of such interactions. Participants from both contexts had deliberate silence and reluctance to speak which was interpreted differently by the teachers, and lack of reciprocal and purposive engagements by students. Based on the dialogic interactive theory, it can be concluded that the aspirations to achieve an inclusive quality of education can best be achieved when teachers are transparent about the expected interactions for all the tenets of the dialogic theory to be achieved. It is therefore recommended that broader conversations about the analysis of situated dynamics of classroom interaction be encouraged to yield critical insights for education towards the attainment of inclusive quality education. Key Words:Dialogic Interaction, Quality Education, Sustainable Development Goals, Reciprocal Learning, Supportive Learning Environment

Suggested Citation

  • Roehl Sybing & Tshimangadzo Selina Mudau, 2023. "A dual analysis study of classroom interactions in Japan and South Africa," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 12(10), pages 191-199, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:191-199
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i10.3096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/3096/2164
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i10.3096
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i10.3096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:191-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.