IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v12y2023i10p165-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scorched-earth democratic South Africa: Governance utopianisms as derivatives of scientific dogma

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Tsheola

    (Professor, Department of Development Studies, University of South Africa, South Africa)

  • Mokoko Piet Sebola

    (Professor, Department of Development Studies, University of South Africa, South Africa)

Abstract

This article explores theorisation that identifies the locus of South Africa’s scorched-earth lived experiences in the fixation on scientific dogma and conceptual binaries as well as governance utopianisms, wherein the latter are derivatives of the former. It explores South African’s lived experiences over the past 28 years in order to demonstrate that politicians’ reverence for governance utopianism has failed to appreciate the unity of realities, facts, values, objectivities, subjectivities, permanences, fluxes and changes, which consist of complex intricacies that are not amenable to dogmatic “incontrovertibly true†sets of authoritative principles and catchy governance utopianisms, because humanity’s imagination and creative thought are experimental in nature given the diversity of spatialities and “geography differences.†From desktop-based research literature survey and theorisation, the article advances a theoretical argument that if “science is one,†and if reality is unitary, then fragmentary theories and models are creatures of humanity’s world of imperfections. Additionally, the article analyses statistical evidence drawn from Statistics South Africa (StatsSA) in order to demonstrate that the scorched-earth metaphor is real for South Africa’s 28-year democratic governance. It finds that in South Africa’s twenty-eight years of democratic experiment, lived experiences resemble scorched-earth metaphor with no silver lining in sight. Philosophically, the paper concludes that if what resides on God’s left is on humanity’s right, then the “rightness†and/or “leftness†of people consists of intractable complexities of particularity, individuality and incommunicability that have led to fragmentary science, fixation on dogma and binaries as well as politicians’ reverence for governance utopianisms, simultaneously as society’s lived experiences resemble normalised scorched-earth. Key Words:Science, Scientific Dogma, Unitary Realities, Corruption, South Africa

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Tsheola & Mokoko Piet Sebola, 2023. "Scorched-earth democratic South Africa: Governance utopianisms as derivatives of scientific dogma," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 12(10), pages 165-174, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:165-174
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i10.3120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/3120/2161
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i10.3120
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i10.3120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:165-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.