IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rau/journl/v5y2011i2.1p457-464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidence Admisibility, Administration And Assessment Through The Electronic Recordings

Author

Listed:
  • George Măgureanu

    (Romanian American University, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Florea Măgureanu

    (Romanian American University, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The main objective of the paper focuses on a current topic of a real interest, given the necessity of solving the civil and criminal actions filed in courts or the arbitrage courts through the evidentiary means, including the electronic ones, for the impartiality and observance of the procedural rights of the parties. Using the context analysis, which leads to a descriptive documentary research, the current article succeeds in identifying the size and the generic principles of a good administration and assessment of the electronic. As a result, we shall perform an analysis of the main objectives concerning: the concept of evidence in general and especially of the electronic writs, the origin sources, the method of administration and assessment, as well as using them. We consider that by applying these principles, there will take place essential changes regarding the admissibility, administration and assessment of the electronic writs, which will lead to a better application of the national legal provisions and of the European Directives, to the compliance of the national legislation with the European Union legislation.

Suggested Citation

  • George Măgureanu & Florea Măgureanu, 2011. "Evidence Admisibility, Administration And Assessment Through The Electronic Recordings," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 5(2.1), pages 457-464, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:5:y:2011:i:2.1:p:457-464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/jisomg/WI11-2/JISOM-WI11-2-A4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:5:y:2011:i:2.1:p:457-464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alex Tabusca (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/firauro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.