IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rau/journl/v5y2010i4-1p89-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Diagnosis And Evaluation Vs. The Alternative Strategies Of Financing The Complex Resources-Economy-Environment Network Working In An Integrative-Regenerative Industrial Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Iuliana Predescu

    (Romanian-American University)

  • Gabriela Cornelia Piciu

    (Romanian Academy)

  • Antoniu Predescu Author-Workplace-Name: Spiru Haret University

Abstract

The problem of financing the complex resources-economy-environment network working in an integrative-regenerative industrial economy is a derivation of the fact either the above-mentioned network intents to minimize the costs of the aftermath of pollution, or to capitalize on new and ‘green’ technologies, it is clear from the start a pollutant, or, to put it into perspective, the resources-economy-environment network will inevitably face (extremely) large costs; once it is assumed such companies must ‘clean’ the environment which they polluted after their (economic) activities are done, they must bear, in any event, important costs, whose quantification cannot be sorted out without the use of a mathematical apparatus, analyzing both economics and human society; this apparatus cannot reject the qualities of NPV (Net Present Value), IRR (Internal Rate of Return) and, last but not least, ROE (Return on Equity) and MSC (Marginal Social Cost) indexes.

Suggested Citation

  • Iuliana Predescu & Gabriela Cornelia Piciu & Antoniu Predescu Author-Workplace-Name: Spiru Haret University, 2010. "Risk Diagnosis And Evaluation Vs. The Alternative Strategies Of Financing The Complex Resources-Economy-Environment Network Working In An Integrative-Regenerative Industrial Economy," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 5(4-1), pages 89-96, Winter-Sp.
  • Handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:4-1:p:89-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/journl/WI10-1/REBE-WI10-1-A11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Piciu, Gabriela Cornelia & Manolescu, Gheorghe & Balasescu, Florin Razvan & Chitiga, Georgiana & Dragoi, Catalin & Predescu, Iuliana & Borza, Mioara & Picu, Alina, 2012. "Evaluation Of The Risk Of Financing Projects Of Environmental Protection," Studii Financiare (Financial Studies), Centre of Financial and Monetary Research "Victor Slavescu", vol. 16(1), pages 132-143.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:4-1:p:89-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alex Tabusca (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferauro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.