IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

The Advantages Of Writs And Electronic Signature In National And International Transactions

  • Florea Măgureanu

    (Romanian American University, Bucharest)

  • George Măgureanu

    (Romanian American University, Bucharest)

Registered author(s):

    Ever increased use of the PC has engendered a series of issues in commercial and civil matters, in general, because many legal provisions imply the existence of writs, of copies signed and authenticated. It is undoubtedly obvious the practical use of drawing up pre-conflict writs, fact which reflects the truth, to a great extent, being drawn up before the conflict between the subjects of the legal report under judgment might arise. Given the major importance of the evidence in clarifying the factual data, the law regulates in detail the procedure of managing the evidence. This represents a guarantee of the right to parties ‘defense. The international system has also influenced the evidentiary system, by using new opportunities and possibilities of giving evidence for supporting the parties’ allegations in the civil lawsuit.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Romanian-American University in its journal Journal of Information Systems and Operations Management.

    Volume (Year): 4 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 2 (December)
    Pages: 93-98

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:4:y:2010:i:2:p:93-98
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Bd.Expozitiei 1B, Bucuresti, Sector 1, Etaj 5, 012101
    Phone: +4-0372-120.140
    Fax: +4-021-202.91.51
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:4:y:2010:i:2:p:93-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alex Tabusca)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.