IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Study Of The Fundamental Risks At The Management Level Of Hotel Victoria, Pitesti

Listed author(s):


    (Faculty of Economics and Law, University of Pitesti, Romania)

  • Dorulet GRADINARU


    (Faculty of Economics and Law, University of Pitesti, Romania)

  • Sinziana NEGRES


    (Faculty of Economics and Law, University of Pitesti, Romania)

Registered author(s):

    It is known the fact that economic risks as probable events can lead to losses in a financial activity. Some managers tend to ignore possible events that would be quite unpleasant, through the consequences it may induce to the company. Management practice in the Romanian companies highlighted three key risks that may affect 60-70% of a company’s overall profitability. These risks include wage policies, policies that refers to loans from the banking system and policies that refers to payments to suppliers and to the state budget. These three performance rates for these risks have alarm thresholds and can be classified into three classes A, B and C in relation to the values they can take. Framing company with a diagram in classes related risk management requires taking appropriate decisions. Using SWOT quantitative model recommends, to the hotel management, the adoption of concrete strategies of increase.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by University of Pitesti in its journal Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences.

    Volume (Year): 15 (2016)
    Issue (Month): 3 ()
    Pages: 68-75

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2016:i:3:p:68-75
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2016:i:3:p:68-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Logica Banica)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.