IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study Of The Fundamental Risks At The Management Level Of Hotel Victoria, Pitesti



    () (Faculty of Economics and Law, University of Pitesti, Romania)

  • Dorulet GRADINARU

    () (Faculty of Economics and Law, University of Pitesti, Romania)

  • Sinziana NEGRES

    () (Faculty of Economics and Law, University of Pitesti, Romania)


It is known the fact that economic risks as probable events can lead to losses in a financial activity. Some managers tend to ignore possible events that would be quite unpleasant, through the consequences it may induce to the company. Management practice in the Romanian companies highlighted three key risks that may affect 60-70% of a company’s overall profitability. These risks include wage policies, policies that refers to loans from the banking system and policies that refers to payments to suppliers and to the state budget. These three performance rates for these risks have alarm thresholds and can be classified into three classes A, B and C in relation to the values they can take. Framing company with a diagram in classes related risk management requires taking appropriate decisions. Using SWOT quantitative model recommends, to the hotel management, the adoption of concrete strategies of increase.

Suggested Citation

  • Puiu GRADINARU & Dorulet GRADINARU & Sinziana NEGRES, 2016. "Study Of The Fundamental Risks At The Management Level Of Hotel Victoria, Pitesti," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, vol. 15(3), pages 68-75.
  • Handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2016:i:3:p:68-75

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    Risk management; Performance rates; Financial security; Alarm threshold; Major-risk diagram; SWOT analysis; Evaluation matrix.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2016:i:3:p:68-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alina Hagiu). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.