IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Budget and budgetary process in Romania


  • Gherghina DRILA

    () (University of Pitesti, Faculty of Economic Sciences)


The unitary system of budgets was an important moment in the evolution of public finances, creating the framework for more effective management and control over allocated funds, public finances becoming those interactive tools used to match the requirements of economic and social environment, also being a catalyst for development. Romanian economy hasn’t matured yet, we are to achieve satisfactory participation in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which, concerning the budget, should be translated into a higher need for contribution, or should be seen, as well, as a factor of progress and a step towards European integration. We appreciate the important role of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Agreement that requires specific behavior in implementing the budget and monitoring the Executive to fulfill the commitments. Also, the EU proposal to consider the national budgets of the governments of other countries in order to monitor the budget deficits would be for this stage also necessary and beneficial.We are now experiencing the reconsidering of the budget process and budget system at European level with the required EU enlargement, which aims to rethinking the perception role that public finances must play inside contemporary society.

Suggested Citation

  • Gherghina DRILA, 2010. "Budget and budgetary process in Romania," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, issue 9, pages 71-74.
  • Handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2010:i:1:p:71-74

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    budget; public finance; legality of public funds;

    JEL classification:

    • H61 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Budget; Budget Systems
    • E60 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - General


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2010:i:1:p:71-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Logica Banica). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.