IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prv/pssjpv/588.html

Comparison of capital structure, risk, and profitability between Islamic and conventional banks in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Arowadi Lubis

    (Universitas Slamet Riyadi)

  • Ida Ayu Fatmayuni

    (Universitas Slamet Riyadi)

  • Hikmah Endraswati

    (Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga)

Abstract

This study aims to compare Islamic and Conventional Banks in Indonesia in terms of Capital Structure, Profitability, and Risk handling. Data for the analysis were taken from the quarterly financial reports of nine Islamic and Conventional Banks for the 2013Q1 – 2020Q3 period. Binary logistic regression was employed as an analysis tool using SPSS 19 software. The results show that Islamic and Conventional Banks are significantly different in terms of capital structure, profitability, and risk handling. Conventional banks have better capital structures and profitability. Islamic Banks, on the other hand, have better risk management.

Suggested Citation

  • Arowadi Lubis & Ida Ayu Fatmayuni & Hikmah Endraswati, 2025. "Comparison of capital structure, risk, and profitability between Islamic and conventional banks in Indonesia," Priviet Social Sciences Journal, Privietlab Research Center, vol. 5(10), pages 375-385, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:prv:pssjpv:588
    DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v5i10.588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.privietlab.org/download.php?id=9697
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.55942/pssj.v5i10.588?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prv:pssjpv:588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mochammad Fahlevi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.privietlab.org/index.php/PSSJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.