IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prv/pssjpv/2221.html

Mapping the marketing of digital payment users: A bibliometric analysis of Scopus-indexed research in 2015–2025

Author

Listed:
  • Shultonnyck Adha

    (Kusuma Negara Business School)

  • Tia Ichwani

    (Universitas Pancasila)

Abstract

Digital payment has become the transactional substrate of contemporary consumer markets; however, it remains unclear whether the scholarship on digital payment users has matured into marketing literature or has remained adoption literature. This study maps the intellectual and conceptual structure of this scholarship through a bibliometric analysis of 1,408 journal articles published in 547 Scopus-indexed sources between 2015 and 2025, retrieved through the Crossref open-metadata layer and screened against the Scopus source list. Performance analysis, Bradford and Lotka modelling, co-word network analysis, and Callon strategic diagramming were combined to characterize growth, concentration, collaboration, and thematic structure. Output grew at 27.6% per year and accumulated 40,025 citations, but the conceptual structure is markedly asymmetric: 47.3% of articles engage pre-adoption belief constructs, whereas only 27.4% address post-adoption relational outcomes and 23.1% address marketing-mix or strategy constructs. Segmentation appears in 0.6% of articles and brand constructs in 1.6%. Five thematic clusters were recovered, of which the acceptance-belief cluster is the most internally developed and the relationship-marketing cluster the least. Therefore, the field is theoretically narrow, methodologically monocultural, and geographically concentrated. A seven-strand research agenda is proposed to reposition digital payment scholarship as marketing research.

Suggested Citation

  • Shultonnyck Adha & Tia Ichwani, 2026. "Mapping the marketing of digital payment users: A bibliometric analysis of Scopus-indexed research in 2015–2025," Priviet Social Sciences Journal, Privietlab Research Center, vol. 6(8), pages 467-488, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:prv:pssjpv:2221
    DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i8.2221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.privietlab.org/download.php?id=13085
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.55942/pssj.v6i8.2221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prv:pssjpv:2221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mochammad Fahlevi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.privietlab.org/index.php/PSSJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.