Author
Listed:
- Debora Paninsari
(Universitas Prima Indonesia)
- Jensari Ariani Sarumaha
(Universitas Prima Indonesia)
- Jessica Margareth Harefa
(Universitas Prima Indonesia)
- Julianti Samosir
(Universitas Prima Indonesia)
- Khairani Khairani
(Universitas Prima Indonesia)
- Primawty Dwi Rijsubo
(Universitas Prima Indonesia)
- Yulia Hanim Pane
(Universitas Prima Indonesia)
Abstract
BBLR babies are babies born with abnormal birth weight (up to 2,499 g) (Sarwono, 2006: 376). Based on the mortality and morbidity rate, low birth weight babies are still a problem from a global or national perspective. To find out the relationship between simple support binder and mother's confidence when caring for BBLR at the Sei Berombang Health Center, Kec. Panai Hilir, Kel. Sei Berombang, Kab. Labuhan Batu, it is necessary to do the kangaroo method treatment with a simple support binder to find out the addition of BBLR babies. The type of research is quasi-experimental research in one group (one group pre test post test design). Sampling using total sampling technique using a questionnaire instrument. The sample is 30 respondents. Data analysis will be carried out using univariate analysis and bivariate analysis. Data collection was carried out using the Wilcoxon test with a degree of significance (α=0.05). Based on the results of the Wilcoxon statistical test (p-value = 0.000) then Ha is accepted and Ho is rejected, meaning that there is a simple support binder relationship with the mother's confidence when caring for BBLR. And there was an increase in the baby's weight after the kangaroo method was applied with a simple support binder. In this case the mother is more confident in caring for the kangaroo method with a simple support binder .
Suggested Citation
Debora Paninsari & Jensari Ariani Sarumaha & Jessica Margareth Harefa & Julianti Samosir & Khairani Khairani & Primawty Dwi Rijsubo & Yulia Hanim Pane, 2023.
"Simple support binder relationship with mother's confidence when caring for BBLR at the Sei Berombang Health Center,"
Priviet Social Sciences Journal, Privietlab Research Center, vol. 3(1), January.
Handle:
RePEc:prv:pssjpv:197
DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v3i1.197
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prv:pssjpv:197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mochammad Fahlevi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.privietlab.org/index.php/PSSJ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.