IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prv/pssjpv/1285.html

A comparative analysis of the accuracy of forecasting methods in predicting strategic food production in East Java

Author

Listed:
  • Pangki Suseno

    (Universitas Bhinneka PGRI)

  • Dwi Junianto

    (Universitas Bhinneka PGRI)

  • Yeni Roha Mahariani

    (Universitas Bhinneka PGRI)

Abstract

Food security is one of the main pillars of sustainable national development, especially in East Java, a region that contributes significantly to the national rice production. However, data from 2016 to 2024 show a downward trend in rice production. This contrasts with the relatively stable consumption demand and poses a risk to future food stability. This study aims to predict future food needs and determine the most accurate forecasting method by comparing the naive method, moving average, single exponential smoothing (SES), and double exponential smoothing (DES) methods. The research data includes annual rice production and consumption volumes in East Java over a nine-year period. We evaluated the forecasting accuracy using the mean absolute deviation (MAD), mean squared error (MSE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The results of the analysis show that the double exponential smoothing method (with α = 0.9 and β = 0.1) provides the best performance, with the lowest error rate (MAPE) of 1.020%. This value is much more accurate than those of the naive method (6.397%), moving average method (6.359%), and single exponential smoothing method (6.530%), which are less responsive to downward trends in the data. Therefore, the DES method is recommended as the most appropriate forecasting model to assist the government of East Java with strategic planning and food security policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Pangki Suseno & Dwi Junianto & Yeni Roha Mahariani, 2026. "A comparative analysis of the accuracy of forecasting methods in predicting strategic food production in East Java," Priviet Social Sciences Journal, Privietlab Research Center, vol. 6(2), pages 554-563, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:prv:pssjpv:1285
    DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i2.1285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.privietlab.org/download.php?id=12658
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.55942/pssj.v6i2.1285?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prv:pssjpv:1285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mochammad Fahlevi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.privietlab.org/index.php/PSSJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.