Author
Listed:
- Araf Aliwijaya
(The University of Bengkulu)
- Adzkiyah Mubarokah
(The University of Bengkulu)
- Nicky Yasmidar
(The University of Bengkulu)
- Ari Suryadi
(The University of Bengkulu)
- Nurrahma Yanti
(Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar)
- Anggi Saputra
(The University of Bengkulu)
- Yoan Berliana Siregar
(The University of Bengkulu)
Abstract
This study aims to identify repository access policies in university libraries in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. A qualitative approach was used through in-depth interviews. Eight informants from four selected libraries, as well as observation and review of repository websites. The results show a wide variety of policies ranging from full open access, limited access per chapter, access only for institutional members through Single Sign-On, to access restrictions only through library computers, as well as take-down and embargo practices. The findings report a general chronological pattern, namely initialization with openness, then gradually restricted due to concerns about plagiarism, protection of sensitive data, administrative burdens, resource limitations, and encouragement from internal actors such as lecturers. The discussion emphasizes that the reality of policy in the field is more complex than the typology in the literature because it is simultaneously influenced by technical, normative, and administrative factors. This research is expected to serve as a guideline for contextual and consistent repository policies, strengthening technical and managerial capacity, copyright policies, and communication strategies to increase researcher participation. Recommendations include the development of integrated embargo and authentication mechanisms to balance open access and the protection of academic integrity.
Suggested Citation
Araf Aliwijaya & Adzkiyah Mubarokah & Nicky Yasmidar & Ari Suryadi & Nurrahma Yanti & Anggi Saputra & Yoan Berliana Siregar, 2026.
"Academic library repository access policy in Indonesia: recent policy updates,"
Priviet Social Sciences Journal, Privietlab Research Center, vol. 6(3), pages 153-167, March.
Handle:
RePEc:prv:pssjpv:1188
DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i3.1188
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prv:pssjpv:1188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mochammad Fahlevi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.privietlab.org/index.php/PSSJ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.