Author
Listed:
- Nico Alexsander
(Bina Nusantara University)
- Dara Kinanti
(Bina Nusantara University)
- Seyda Fathimya
(Bina Nusantara University)
- Anaise Abbril Khan
(Bina Nusantara University)
- Nadira Elysia Putri
(Bina Nusantara University)
- Indri Ikap Prasetiyawati
(Bina Nusantara University)
Abstract
This study investigates whether motivation, technology use, and learning interest meaningfully differentiate learning outcomes among undergraduate students in a private university in Indonesia. Drawing on theories of self-determination, interest development, and educational technology, the research examines three frequently cited drivers of academic performance in higher education. A quantitative, cross-sectional survey was administered to 100 students at BINUS University Alam Sutera, who completed a structured online questionnaire measuring learning motivation, technology use in learning, learning interest, and self-reported learning outcomes. Composite scores were calculated for each construct, and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was employed to test for differences in mean learning outcomes across levels of motivation, technology use, and learning interest. Descriptive statistics indicated generally moderate to high levels of motivation, frequent technology use, and positive learning interest in the sample. However, ANOVA results showed no statistically significant differences in learning outcomes across levels of any of the three predictors (p > 0.05). These findings contrast with much of the theoretical and empirical literature that posits positive effects of motivation, interest, and technology integration on academic achievement. The results suggest that, in this context, relatively uniform assessment practices, measurement limitations, and unobserved factors such as instructional quality and prior ability may overshadow the direct influence of the studied variables. The study highlights the need for more refined measurement, stronger alignment between technology and pedagogy, and more discriminating assessment systems in future research and practice.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:prv:jehtpv:30
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prv:jehtpv:30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mochammad Fahlevi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.privietlab.org/index.php/JEHT .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.