Author
Abstract
The philosophy of economics has rarely asked how economic knowledge is formed, justified and applied in a plural, Muslim-majority, post-authoritarian developing society, despite Indonesia's formative role in twentieth-century debates over the cultural scope of economic theory. This article systematically reviews contemporary scholarship on the philosophical and epistemological foundations of Indonesian economic thought. Following SPAR-4-SLR and PRISMA 2020, a Scopus-derived corpus of 55 records (retrieved 4 September 2026) was screened to 44 eligible studies, profiled descriptively and synthesised through critical interpretive synthesis around the concept of epistemic orders: socially sustained configurations of epistemic authority, anthropology of the economic agent, conception of the economic good and institutional carriers. Six orders structure the literature: constitutional–nationalist, Islamic–theological, customary–communal, technocratic–market, structural–institutionalist and juridical–procedural. Fifty-nine per cent of studies invoke two orders, and hybrid frameworks proliferate in halal governance and state-enterprise reform. The field is juridified: 17 of 44 studies appear in law journals and doctrinal analysis is the modal method, so that questions about economic truth are posed as questions about legal certainty. Warrants are methodologically segregated—quantitative evidence serves only the technocratic order, ethnography the customary order, doctrine the Islamic and juridical orders—so that hybridisation occurs at the level of concepts rather than evidence. The article offers the first systematic mapping of post-Reformasi Indonesian economic thought as an epistemological field, proposes a typology of inter-order interaction (subsumption, hybridisation, translation and contestation) and sets out a research agenda for a philosophy of economics attentive to plural orders of justification in the Global South. Keywords : philosophy of economics; epistemic pluralism; Pancasila economics; Islamic economics; legal pluralism; moral economy; Indonesia; systematic literature review
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:prv:jeeppv:2259
DOI: 10.55942/jeep.v1i2.2259
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prv:jeeppv:2259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mochammad Fahlevi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.privietlab.org/index.php/JEEP .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.