IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/rfreco/rfeco_0769-0479_2007_num_22_2_1650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L'uniformité versus la différenciation des normes dans les accords environnementaux internationaux

Author

Listed:
  • Basak Bayramoglu

Abstract

[fre] Les accords environnementaux internationaux sont caractérisés par des objectifs de dépollution soit uniformes soit différenciés pour des pays. L'efficacité économique requiert, a priori, la mise en place des règles de réduction différenciées selon les pays. Or, on observe que la plupart des accords environnementaux signés actuellement au niveau international sont régis par des règles uniformes de réduction des émissions. Des arguments théoriques, comme l'existence du commerce international entre pays ou la difficulté d'aboutir à un accord, peuvent expliquer l'usage de ces règles. L'objectif de ce travail est de préciser les contours factuels et théoriques de l'utilisation fréquente des règles uniformes dans ces accords. Après une description de la nature des accords environnementaux internationaux, nous analysons les règles de réduction des émissions actuellement utilisées dans les négociations internationales pour l'environnement. Cette analyse est mise en perspective avec l'étude des normes pour la régulation des problèmes de pollution domestique pour laquelle le clivage entre les normes uniformes et les normes différenciées existe également. La dernière section fournit une revue de la littérature théorique sur l'évaluation de l'efficacité économique et environnementale des normes uniformes dans les accords environnementaux internationaux. [eng] Uniformity versus Differentiation of Emission Reduction Targets in International Environmental Agreements . International environmental agreements are characterized either by uniform or differentiated emission reduction targets for countries. Cost-efficiency requires, in general, the setting of differentiated emission reduction targets for heteregenous countries. We observe, however, a frequent use of uniform emission reduction targets in international environmental agreements. One can mention several theoretical arguments to justify the use of these rules, such as the existence of international trade or the difficulty to reach an agreement. The aim of this paper is to present the main theoretical and factual arguments in order to explain the frequent use of uniform standards in these agreements. First, we provide a description of the nature of international environmental agreements. Then, we analyze the type of emission reduction targets currently used in international negotiations on the environment. This analysis is put in perspective with the study of the uniform standards implemented for the regulation of domestic pollution problems. Finally, we provide a survey of the theoretical literature on the economic and environmental efficiency of uniform standards used in the international environmental agreements.

Suggested Citation

  • Basak Bayramoglu, 2007. "L'uniformité versus la différenciation des normes dans les accords environnementaux internationaux," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 22(2), pages 103-128.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:rfreco:rfeco_0769-0479_2007_num_22_2_1650
    DOI: 10.3406/rfeco.2007.1650
    Note: DOI:10.3406/rfeco.2007.1650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/rfeco.2007.1650
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/rfeco_0769-0479_2007_num_22_2_1650
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/rfeco.2007.1650?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rfreco:rfeco_0769-0479_2007_num_22_2_1650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/rfeco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.