IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

1992: mythe ou réalité?

Listed author(s):
  • Alexander Italianer
Registered author(s):

    [fre] A la suite du sommet de Bruxelles et de la publication du rapport Cecchini, sur les implications économiques liées à la réalisation du marché intérieur européen, le climat économique, s'est sensiblement amélioré. L'analyse de ce rapport et de la littérature publiée postérieurement montre que même si l'on remplace les effets économiques potentiels du marché intérieur par ses effets réels, les résultats restent significativement positifs sur le plan macro-économique. Cependant, il ressort également de cette étude que toutes les potentialités du marché intérieur ne sont pas réalisées, ce qui souligne l'importance des politiques d'accompagnement de ce processus. [eng] Shortly after the Brussels summit and the publication of the Cecchini report, about the economic implications of the internal market, a considerable improvement in the business climate took place in the E.C. and elsewhere. The economic literature, analysed in this paper, has demonstrated that even if realistic rather than potential economic effects are calculated, the results remain significatly positive on a macroeconomic basis. However, this study also emphasizes that full potentialities of the internal market have not yet been transformed into reality. This points to the importance of accompanying policies.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Revue française d'économie.

    Volume (Year): 5 (1990)
    Issue (Month): 4 ()
    Pages: 209-248

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:prs:rfreco:rfeco_0769-0479_1990_num_5_4_1270
    Note: DOI:10.3406/rfeco.1990.1270
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rfreco:rfeco_0769-0479_1990_num_5_4_1270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.