IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Les keynésiens doivent-ils se passer de la courbe de Phillips?

Listed author(s):
  • Lawrence H. Summers

[fre] La courbe de Phillips semble être éliminée des modèles puisqu'une inflation stable n'affecte pas le chômage. Cela ne signifie pas qu'aucune politique n'est mais plutôt qu'il existe des limites à l'équilibre qu'une politique peut imposer. La difficulté est de trouver la politique adéquate ce qui l'amélioration des théories de l'hystérésis décrivant comment l'histoire détermine l'équilibre d'une économie. En fait, pour mener une politique efficace, il faut, comme un joueur de poker, se faire un jugement au cas par cas et mener des actions audacieuses. Cela sera beaucoup plus efficace que suivre passivement les règles établies, d'autant plus que les théories améliorées des hystérésis peuvent être d'une grande aide. [eng] The natural rate Phillips curve can be eliminated from our models since steady inflation does not affect the average level of unemployment. This does not mean that no policy is efficient, this proves only that there are limits to the equilibria that policies can impose on the economy. The difficulty is in finding the right policy, this will require improved hysteresis theories describing how history determines an economy equilibrium. In fact, a shrewd policy maker will make case by case judgments — just as a poker player — and will not shrink from bold actions. He will be much more efficient than others who passively follow fixed rules and in addition improved theories of economic hysteresis will help them out.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Revue française d'économie.

Volume (Year): 5 (1990)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 3-28

in new window

Handle: RePEc:prs:rfreco:rfeco_0769-0479_1990_num_5_2_1248
Note: DOI:10.3406/rfeco.1990.1248
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rfreco:rfeco_0769-0479_1990_num_5_2_1248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.