IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Comparer les marchés du travail

Listed author(s):
  • Pierre Morin
Registered author(s):

    [eng] Comparions of labour markets The labour market performances of the French economy have traditionally been very poor. The aim of this conference is to review some explaining factors often presented as being ai the root of the problem. The paper first recalls some important facts, such as the end of the "catch-up" period in Europe, or some changes in the composition of working force, and how some countries absorbed them. It discusses the arguments of "lack of flexibility", in the usual accepted mean-ing of the word, and argues that the proofs of their relevance are not always as convincing as what wouldbe neededin such case. On the otherhand, the argument of excessive tightness of economie policy is equally not convincing, and we are only sure of what occurred in the early ninettes. The paper then highlights some facts, such as the lack of formation of the French labour force, especially its fraction which endured the hardest period of the crisis. It seems that there was no coherence between truly ambitious objectives (such a high level of minimum wage), and the means to achieve them, which are not concentrated in the field of the labour relations. The paper also emphasizes the probable importance of unobserved hetero-geneities in the comparative analysis of labour markets. To ignore them would be misleading in two ways: first, to exaggerate the general importance of rigidities, second to misrepresent the negative impact of some of them. [fre] Comparer les marchés du travail La performance française en termes de taux de chômage a été très décevante, et le demeure. Le but de cette conférence est de discuter des facteurs explicatifs souvent présentés comme étant à la racine du problème. Le texte rappelle d'abord plusieurs faits importants, telle la fin de la période de rattrapage en Europe, ou certains changements importants dans la composition de la force de travail, et comment certains pays les ont absorbés. Il discute alors l'argument de « manque de flexibilité », au sens habituel du terme, et cherche à montrer que les preuves de sa pertinence ne sont pas aussi convaincantes qu'il serait nécessaire pour une question de ce type. D'un autre côté, la responsabilité d'une rigueur excessive de la politique économique manque de pouvoir de conviction. Nous sommes seulement sûrs de ce qui s'est passé au début des années 1990. L'article présente alors quelques faits, tel le manque de formation de la main-d'œuvre française, particulièrement celle de sa fraction qui a subi la période la plus dure de la crise. Il semble qu'il n'y ait pas eu de cohérence entre des objectifs sociaux justement ambitieux, et les moyens de les garantir, moyens qui ne concernent pas seulement les rela­tions du travail. L'article insiste également sur l'importance des hétérogénéités non observées dans l'analyse comparative des marchés du travail. Les ignorer peut être trompeur de deux façons : exagérer l'importance des « rigidités », ou mal caractériser les conséquences négatives de certaines d'entre elles.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Revue économique.

    Volume (Year): 53 (2002)
    Issue (Month): 3 ()
    Pages: 345-390

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_2002_num_53_3_410410
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_2002_num_53_3_410410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.