IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Incertitude sur le change et multinationalisation en concurrence imparfaite

Listed author(s):
  • Larbi Dohni
Registered author(s):

    [eng] Exchange rate uncertainty and multinationalization in an imperfect framework This paper shows how, in a duopoly framework, uncertainty may provide an incentive for multinational production. Given its sequential nature, foreign direct investment can play a strategic role because, by establishing plants in more than one country, it enables the firm to relocate production once these costs are known. Owing to the asymmetry between a multinational enterprise and a single nation firm, production flexibility affects the outcomes of the competition between these firms. [fre] Incertitude sur le change et multinationalisation en concurrence imparfaite Face à l'incertitude sur le change, nous montrons que la multinationalisation peut être motivée par la recherche d'avantages stratégiques associés à la plus grande flexibilité de production dont bénéficie une firme multinationale par rapport à un concurrent domestique déjà installé sur le marché. Le rôle stratégique de l'investissement direct à l'étranger est mis en évidence en tenant compte de la nature séquentielle de cette décision, ce qui suppose une définition de la flexibilité en termes d'ensemble d'actes.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Revue économique.

    Volume (Year): 52 (2001)
    Issue (Month): 4 ()
    Pages: 791-810

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_2001_num_52_4_410357
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_2001_num_52_4_410357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.