IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Utilité absolue ou utilité relative. Etat des lieux

Listed author(s):
  • Andrew E. Clark

[fre] Le principal postulat de la microéconomie est que l'individu rationnel maximise une fonction d'utilité absolue ; celle-ci, pour la plupart des sociologues et des psychologues, est trop simpliste. Dans cet article, on teste l'idée selon laquelle la fonction qui est maximisée est relative : une partie de l'utilité individuelle provient en effet des comparaisons (aux autres ou au passé). Les mesures de l'utilité, telles que la satisfaction dans le travail ou la satisfaction globale, permettent d'examiner le rapport entre le bien-être dont les individus font état et, d'une part, leur revenu, et, d'autre part, leur statut sur le marché de travail. Les résultats valident l'hypothèse d'utilité relative, qui remet en cause aussi bien l'analyse microéconomique traditionnelle que les politiques publiques qui en découlent. [eng] Is utility absolute or relative? Some recent findings One of the basic axioms of microeconomics is that individuals maximise a utility function defined over absolute levels of goods or income. Most sociologists or psychologists consider this to be too restrictive. In this paper, I summarise some recent research showing that utility is partly relative, depending on comparisons to others or to the individual's own past. Two relationships are modelled: that between job satisfaction and wages, and that between general subjective well-being and unemployment. The fact that strong comparison effects are found in both relationships calls into question both standard microeconomic models of behaviour which assume absolute utility functions and the economic policy recommendations which result from these models.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License

File URL:
Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Revue économique.

Volume (Year): 51 (2000)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Pages: 459-471

in new window

Handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_2000_num_51_3_410528
Note: DOI:10.3406/reco.2000.410528
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_2000_num_51_3_410528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.