IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Innovation, coopération inter-entreprises et politique de la concurrence

Listed author(s):
  • Jean-Luc Gaffard
  • Michel Quéré

[fre] L'objectif de cet article est de contraster deux approches différentes des relations entre innovation et concurrence, l'une, traditionnelle qui met l'accent sur l'existence d'une structure optimale, l'autre qui retient l'exigence de viabilité des processus d'innovation. Il montre que les conditions de viabilité ne peuvent pas être réduites au fait d'imposer une structure de marché particulière. Les conditions de coordination permettent à la fois le démantèlement des structures de marché existantes et la stabilisation de la nouvelle. Cette dernière ne peut pas être dessinée a priori, mais seulement en relation avec le processus de changement lui-même. Elle sera différente suivant la manière dont la coordination prend place. Par voie de conséquence, la politique de la concurrence, plutôt que d'imposer une structure de marché présumée optimale, devrait consister à comparer différents arrangements organisationnels au regard des exigences de viabilité. [eng] Innovation, inter-firms co-operation and competition policy - This paper aims at contrasting two different approaches of the relations between innovation and competition. The traditional one focuses on the existence of an optimal structure and the other focuses on viability requirements. It shows that viability conditions cannot be reduced to the enforcement of a specific market structure. Co-ordination conditions allow both the dismantlement of existing market structures and the stabilisation of new ones. The latter cannot be defined a priori, but only in relation with the process of change itself. It will be different according to the way co-ordination takes place. As a consequence, rather than enforcing a presumed optimal structure competition policy should consist in comparing different organisational arrangements with respect to viability requirements.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Économie rurale.

Volume (Year): 277 (2003)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 152-166

in new window

Handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_2003_num_277_1_5444
Note: DOI:10.3406/ecoru.2003.5444
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_2003_num_277_1_5444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.