IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Discussion pratique et discussion stratégique au nom de l'environnement. Différents modes de concertation pour définir des règles de gestion des marais

Listed author(s):
  • Jacqueline Candau
  • Claire Ruault
Registered author(s):

    [fre] Deux dispositifs de concertation, renvoyant à des acteurs et à des modes de discussion différents, ont été mis en place à partir des années quatre-vingt- dix à propos de la gestion des marais en Charente- Maritime. Ils ont produit des résultats différents: légitimation de relations de collaboration jusque-là difficiles d'un côté, formulation d'une problématique technique de l'autre. Ces résultats sont complémentaires pour faire avancer la définition de nouvelles règles d'action. Mais leur articulation difficile interroge les conditions de la prise en compte du savoir des praticiens, ainsi que les possibilités d'adapter les dispositifs en fonction de l'évolution des discussions. Le caractère pragmatique et évolutif des dispositifs s'avère une condition d'une concertation productive sur le plan des idées. [eng] Two dialogue plans, distinguished by their participants and the modal of discussion, were launched in 1990 in Charente-Maritime about the marsh management. They have produced various results: le- gitimization of collaboration relations on one hand, formulation of a technical problematic on the other hand. These results are complementary to further define new action rules. But their difficult linking questions the conditions to consider the practitioner's knowledge, and the possibilities to fit the plans to the discussions progress. The evolving and pragmatic nature of the plans proved a condition to have a productive dialogue about ideas.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Économie rurale.

    Volume (Year): 270 (2002)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 19-35

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_2002_num_270_1_5324
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecoru.2002.5324
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Jacqueline Candau, 1999. "Usage du concept d'espace public pour une lecture critique des processus de concertation. [Le cas des OLAE en Aquitaine]," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 252(1), pages 9-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_2002_num_270_1_5324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.