IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Qui gagne et qui perd au jeu des quotas laitiers ? Une approche à partir de travaux récents conduits en Rhône-Alpes

Listed author(s):
  • Michel Buisson
  • Michel Guglielmi
Registered author(s):

    [eng] Milk quotas have effects on farms which are all the more negative as technical skill are low, the size of the farm is reduced, the needs for growth are not satisfied, diversification is difficult, and the milk buyer exceeds his reference quantity. On local agricultural economies, their effects result from demographic, technical and economic structure of the producers and from the type and situation of the buyer. Besides these observations it has been brought out how local bodies and individuals haved worked together in relation to the quota national compromise, as it is one of the main features of the functioning dairy economy with the quotas. [fre] Les quotas ont sur les exploitations des effets d'autant plus négatifs que leur niveau technique et leur taille sont faibles, que des besoins de croissance ne sont pas assurés, que la diversification est difficile, que l'acheteur de lait est en dépassement. Les effets sur les économies agricoles locales résultent à la fois de la structure démographique et technico-économique des producteurs de lait, du type et de la situation de l'acheteur. Au-delà de ces constats, la façon dont les forces en présence au plan local ont retravaillé socialement dans le cadre du compromis national autour des quotas, est un aspect essentiel du fonctionnement durable sous quotas de l'économie laitière.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Économie rurale.

    Volume (Year): 199 (1990)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 14-18

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_1990_num_199_1_4121
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecoru.1990.4121
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_1990_num_199_1_4121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.