IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/recofi/ecofi_0987-3368_2006_num_84_3_4131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Continuité et robustesse des principaux marchés financiers : le point de vue des régulateurs américains

Author

Listed:
  • Stacy L. Coleman

Abstract

[fre] Les événements du 11 septembre ont mis en évidence l’importance de mettre en place et d’entretenir des dispositifs de secours pour assurer la résilience du système financier américain. L’interdépendance critique dans l’ensemble des milieux financiers est devenue évidente lorsque les perturbations de l’infrastructure des télécommunications ont mis à mal le fonctionnement des transactions financières. À la lumière de cette expérience, les régulateurs bancaires fédéraux américains s’attendent désormais à ce que certaines institutions bancaires prennent des mesures pour faire face à des catastrophes de grande ampleur affectant toute une région et à la perte ou l’indisponibilité de personnels qui peut en résulter. De tels plans devraient également étudier et prendre en compte les interdépendances, tant propres au marché que géographiques, qui existent entre les participants au système financier et les fournisseurs d’infrastructures. . Classification JEL : G21, G28 [eng] Continuity and robustness of critical financial markets : US supervisory perspective . The events of September 11 underscored how important it is for critical financial markets to maintain adequate contingency arrangements to ensure the resilience of the US financial system. In addition, the critical interdependencies across the financial industry, although understood in the context of planning for the Year 2000, became immediately evident when disruptions to the telecommunications infrastructure impeded financial market transactions. In light of these experiences, the US federal banking regulators now expect certain banking organizations to plan for the potential for wide-area disasters that affect an entire region and for the resulting loss or inaccessibility of staff. Such planning should also consider and address interdependencies, both market-based and geographic, among financial system participants as well as infrastructure service providers. . JEL classification : G21, G28

Suggested Citation

  • Stacy L. Coleman, 2006. "Continuité et robustesse des principaux marchés financiers : le point de vue des régulateurs américains," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 84(3), pages 241-260.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2006_num_84_3_4131
    DOI: 10.3406/ecofi.2006.4131
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecofi.2006.4131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecofi.2006.4131
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecofi_0987-3368_2006_num_84_3_4131
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecofi.2006.4131?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2006_num_84_3_4131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecofi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.