IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/recofi/ecofi_0987-3368_2002_num_68_4_4771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les modes d’équilibrage des systèmes de retraite : éléments analytiques du débat

Author

Listed:
  • Didier Blanchet

Abstract

[fre] On analyse les quatre modes principaux d'équilibrage des retraites face aux changements démographiques à venir. Ne jouer que sur le niveau de vie relatif des retraités conduirait à l'abaisser considérablement. Ne jouer que sur la hausse des cotisations semble plus envisageable, mais ce serait au détriment d'autres besoins collectifs, et on ne peut garantir que cette politique serait neutre pour l'emploi. La capitalisation consiste à anticiper la hausse de l'effort contributif : son seul avantage est que l'effort requis sera plus faible à long terme si le rendement du capital est durablement supérieur à la croissance économique. Remonter l'âge de la retraite, pour finir, serait une réponse logique à l'allongement de la durée de vie mais ne jouer que sur cet instrument supposerait, là encore, un ajustement considérable. Au final, la réponse aux contraintes démographiques jouera probablement sur un panachage des quatre outils. Classification JEL : D3, H55, J22, J26 [eng] Restoring equilibrium in pension systems : an analytical presentation We analyze the four main possibilities for restoring equilibrium of pension schemes in front of future demographic changes. Relying exclusively on a downward adjustment of pensions would imply a very large reduction of pensioners' relative standard of living. Relying exclusively on increases of contributions seems more realistic, but this would be at the expense of other social needs, and the neutrality of such a policy for employment levels cannot be warranted. Funding consists in anticipating requested financial efforts : its only advantage is that this financial effort will be lower in the long run, if returns on capital are permanently higher than economic growth. Raising the retirement age, at last, would be a logical answer to an increasing life expectancy, bur relying exclusively on this tool would, once again, imply a very large adjustment. On the whole, the answer to demographic changes will, probably, require a mix of these four instruments. JEL classification : D3, H55, J22, J26

Suggested Citation

  • Didier Blanchet, 2002. "Les modes d’équilibrage des systèmes de retraite : éléments analytiques du débat," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 68(4), pages 55-65.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2002_num_68_4_4771 Note: DOI:10.3406/ecofi.2002.4771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.3406/ecofi.2002.4771
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.persee.fr/doc/ecofi_0987-3368_2002_num_68_4_4771
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bertrand Maillet & Thierry Michel, 2003. "An index of market shocks based on multiscale analysis," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 88-97.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D3 - Microeconomics - - Distribution
    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
    • J26 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Retirement; Retirement Policies
    • D3 - Microeconomics - - Distribution
    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
    • J26 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Retirement; Retirement Policies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2002_num_68_4_4771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE). General contact details of provider: http://www.persee.fr/collection/ecofi .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.