IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Les mutineries de 1797 dans la Navy

Listed author(s):
  • Olivier Chaline
Registered author(s):

    [fre] Les grandes mutineries navales de 1797 furent la plus grande explosion de mécontentement connue dans la Royal Navy depuis 1653. Deux mutineries consécutives à Spithead furent suivies par une en mer affectant le North Sea Squadron et une autre à bord des navires stationnés à la Nore. L'immobilisation de la flotte (sauf en cas d'attaque française) fut la principale caractéristique. Il n'y eut rien de comparable avec l'effondrement révolutionnaire de la marine française en 1789-1790. Les marins n'étaient pas hostiles à la guerre contre la France et ne voulaient pas détruire la hiérarchie sociale. Ils aspiraient à de meilleures conditions de service. Les mutineries n'eurent pas de conséquences fâcheuses sur l'effort de guerre britannique. [eng] The great naval mutinies of 1797 were the largest outbreak of discontent in the Royal Navy since 1653. Two successive mutinies at Spithead were followed by two others, one at sea in the North Sea Squadron and one on board of the ships at the Nore. The immobilization of the fleet (except in cas of French attack) was the most significative feature.There was no comparison with the revolutionary collapse of the French Navy in 1789-1790. Seamen were not opposed to war against France and they didn' want to destroy the social hierarchy. They hoped better conditions of service. The mutinies had no disruptive consequences on the British war effort.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Histoire, économie et société.

    Volume (Year): 24 (2005)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 51-61

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:prs:hiseco:hes_0752-5702_2005_num_24_1_2535
    Note: DOI:10.3406/hes.2005.2535
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:hiseco:hes_0752-5702_2005_num_24_1_2535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.