IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecoprv/ecop_0249-4744_2002_num_156_5_6884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La procédure de passation des marchés publics : contrat à prix fixe renégociable par des avenants ou contrat incitatif ?

Author

Listed:
  • François Maréchal

Abstract

[eng] Investment Decisions Under Socio-Political Uncertainty : a Procedure For Evaluating Public projects.. Public choice processes have two dimensions, in that they must take account of economic aspects and the socio-political context in which they occur. Privileging one of the two dimensions inevitably leads to inefficiencies. The authors set out a two-stage experimental evaluation procedure based on two economic theories to evaluate the benefits of a given project taking socio-political aspects into account. [fre] Dans le cadre des marchés attribués par appel d’offres, le Code des marchés publics prévoit généralement l’utilisation de contrats à prix fixes renégociables par des avenants. Nous proposons une modélisation de cette procédure, permettant de fournir une justification à l’observation d’offres dites “ anormalement basses” et de surcoûts dans les marchés publics français. Nous montrons ensuite que cette procédure peut dominer le contrat incitatif linéaire optimal de McAfee et McMillan (1986).

Suggested Citation

  • François Maréchal, 2002. "La procédure de passation des marchés publics : contrat à prix fixe renégociable par des avenants ou contrat incitatif ?," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 156(5), pages 85-95.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_2002_num_156_5_6884
    DOI: 10.3406/ecop.2002.6884
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.2002.6884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecop.2002.6884
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0249-4744_2002_num_156_5_6884
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecop.2002.6884?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_2002_num_156_5_6884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.