IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecoprv/ecop_0249-4744_2000_num_145_4_6114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contrat avec aversion pour le risque et partage des risques : une application à l'industrie spatiale

Author

Listed:
  • Françoise Bastié

Abstract

[fre] Contrat avec aversion pour le risque et partage des risques : une application à l'industrie spatiale par Françoise Bastié Dans l'industrie spatiale française, les avenants aux contrats initiaux permettent de répartir le risque entre l'agence spatiale française et les industriels. Cet article étudie le partage du risque dans ce type de contrats. Dans le modèle, le principal (l'agence spatiale), neutre envers le risque, offre un contrat constitué de deux prix à un agent (l'industriel), averse au risque. Selon le prix choisi par ce dernier, le principal contrôle ou non le coût de l'industriel. Par conséquent, l'audit est sous le contrôle de l'agent. Sous cette hypothèse, le risque peut être entièrement supporté par l'une des deux parties au contrat ou bien partagé entre elles. Le résultat dépend du degré d'aversion pour le risque de l'agent et du coût de l'effort. Cette analyse théorique est suivie d'une étude économétrique dont l'objectif est d'estimer le paramètre de partage du risque dans les contrats agence spatiale-industriels. [eng] Contract with risk-aversion and risk-sharing: an application to the space industry by Françoise Fouquet-Bastié In the French space industry, annexes to the initial contracts provide for risk-sharing between the French space agency and industrial firms. This article examines the sharing of risk in this type of contract. In the model, the principal (the space agency), which is risk-neutral, proposes a contract comprising two prices to an agent (the industrialist) who is risk-averse. Depending on the price chosen by the latter, the principal will or will not audit the industrialist's costs. As a consequence, the audit is in the control of the agent. On this assumption, the risk can either be entirely borne by one of the two parties to the contract or shared between them. The result depends on the agent's degree of risk-aversion and the cost of the effort made. This theoretical analysis is followed by an econometric study aimed at estimating the risk-sharing parameter in contracts between the space agency and industrial firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Françoise Bastié, 2000. "Contrat avec aversion pour le risque et partage des risques : une application à l'industrie spatiale," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 145(4), pages 83-96.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_2000_num_145_4_6114 Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.2000.6114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.3406/ecop.2000.6114
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0249-4744_2000_num_145_4_6114
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brigitte Dormont, 1989. "Petite apologie des données de panel," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 87(1), pages 19-32.
    2. Sandberg, Åke, 1995. "Enriching Production: Perspectives on Volvo's Uddevalla plant as an alternative to lean production," MPRA Paper 10785, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2007.
    3. Klemperer, Paul, 1992. "Equilibrium Product Lines: Competing Head-to-Head May Be Less Competitive," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 82(4), pages 740-755, September.
    4. Alfred D. Chandler, 1992. "Organizational Capabilities and the Economic History of the Industrial Enterprise," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(3), pages 79-100, Summer.
    5. Coriat, Benjamin, 1995. "Variety, Routines and Networks: The Metamorphosis of Fordist Firms," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 205-227.
    6. Gold, Bela, 1981. "Changing Perspectives on Size, Scale, and Returns: An Interpretive Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 19(1), pages 5-33, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_2000_num_145_4_6114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE). General contact details of provider: http://www.persee.fr/collection/ecop .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.