IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Impacts de différents instruments de politique agricole en termes de surplus domestique et de relations commerciales

Listed author(s):
  • Vincent Richard
Registered author(s):

    [fre] Impacts de différents instruments de politique agricole en termes de surplus domestique et de relations commerciales par Vincent Richard Dans le cadre des débats récents sur la prochaine réforme de la PAC et dans la perspective du prochain cycle de négociations commerciales multilatérales, les théories de l'économie du bien-être permettent d'apporter un éclairage sur les enjeux des choix de politiques agricoles en termes de gains de bien-être pour l'ensemble de l'Union européenne. Les conclusions que l'analyse de différentes politiques sous l'angle de l'économie du bien-être permettent de tirer concernent également les relations commerciales. Il apparaît alors qu'en équilibre partiel sur le secteur agricole, et selon le critère de surplus collectif domestique (somme des gains et des pertes pour les producteurs, les consommateurs et les finances publiques), une économie a intérêt à une suppression multilatérale de toutes les politiques distordant les choix de production et de consommation internes et les échanges commerciaux. Cette voie ne remet pas en cause le respect des objectifs de politique agricole tels ceux assignés à la PAC. Elle permet au contraire de les atteindre au moindre coût, contrairement aux politiques de soutien des prix, assortie ou non de contingentement de l'offre. [eng] The impacts of different agricultural policy instruments on domestic surplus and trade relations by Vincent Richard Welfare economics explain some of the implications of agricultural policy choices on welfare gains for the European Union in the light of recent debates on the coming CAP reform and the coming round of multilateral trade talks. The findings of the welfare economics analysis of different policies also concern trade relations. It is found that an economy in partial equilibrium in terms of its agricultural sector, using the domestic collective surplus criterion (sum of gains and losses for producers, consumers and public finances), would find it worthwhile to multilaterally withdraw all the policies that distort its domestic production and consumption choices and trade. This path does not challenge compliance with agricultural policy targets such as the CAP objectives. It actually helps to attain them at less cost, unlike price support policies, irrespective of whether they are combined with supply quotas.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Économie & prévision.

    Volume (Year): 137 (1999)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 109-116

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1999_num_137_1_5951
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.1999.5951
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1999_num_137_1_5951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.