IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecoprv/ecop_0249-4744_1996_num_122_1_5776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La complexité en question : les prestations familiales sont-elles simplifïables ?

Author

Listed:
  • Cédric Afsa

Abstract

[fre] La complexité en question : les prestations familiales sont-elles simplifiables ? . par Cédric Afsa . Les prestations familiales sont d'une rare complexité. Dotées de multiples objectifs, elles ont des impacts, pas toujours aisément repérables, sur des domaines éloignés du fait familial. Par ailleurs, leur nombre, leurs règles d'attribution et de calcul, opaques à force de foisonnement, rendent le système illisible. Les familles ne le comprennent plus, ce qui risque à terme d'avoir des effets dévastateurs sur la cohésion sociale. Il est donc impératif de le simplifier. En même temps, l'idéal d'un système de prestations qui soit d'une extrême simplicité et à caractère purement familial, non seulement est illusoire, mais aussi dangereux car il perturberait profondément l'efficacité, l'équité et la cohérence de la politique sociale. C'est donc sur une voie moyenne qu'il faut s'engager, réformer le système en en gommant la complication pour rendre visibles et lisibles ses diverses composantes et leurs modes d'articulation. [eng] Complexity Questioned: Can Family Allowances Be Simplified? by Cédric Afsa . Family allowances are remarkably complex. With their many objectives, they do not always have easily identifiable effects on aspects detached from the family domain. Moreover, their number and obscure allocation and calculation rules due to their abundance mean that the system is not easy to comprehend. The fact that families do not understand it could eventually have devastating effects on social cohesion. It is therefore crucial that it be simplified. At the same time, the ideal of an extremely simple and purely family-oriented benefit system is not only a pipedream, but also dangerous as it would seriously disrupt the efficiency, equity and unity of the welfare policy. A middle ground therefore needs to be found in a system reform that eliminates its complexity to make its different components and the links between them visible and legible.

Suggested Citation

  • Cédric Afsa, 1996. "La complexité en question : les prestations familiales sont-elles simplifïables ?," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 122(1), pages 47-58.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1996_num_122_1_5776
    DOI: 10.3406/ecop.1996.5776
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.1996.5776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecop.1996.5776
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0249-4744_1996_num_122_1_5776
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecop.1996.5776?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Magnoli, Alessandro, 2002. "What Do You Mean?: Conceptual Clarity in Social Policy," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 237, March.
    2. Alessandro Magnoli, 2002. "What Do You Mean?: Conceptual Clarity in Social Policy," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 15358, February.
    3. repec:idb:brikps:237 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1996_num_122_1_5776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.