IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prm/awjrnl/v2y2021pe027.html

Scientific production on open science in Information Science: a study based on the ENANCIB event

Author

Listed:
  • de Araújo Telmo, Flávia

    (Universidade Federal da Paraíba)

  • Matos Autran, Marynice de Medeiros

    (Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Brasil.)

  • Araújo da Silva, Alzira Karla

    (Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Brasil.)

Abstract

Open Science has been consolidated as a strategy for building and accessing the knowledge produced in the scientific community. This study analyzes the scientific production on Open Science presented at the National Meeting of Research in Information Science (ENANCIB, in Portuguese). The analysis was based on critical-reflexive inference about the recovered materials, using social network analysis to analyze co-authorship networks. We identified 93 papers during 2015-2019, evidencing an increasing evolution. The papers mainly were presented as oral communication/full papers and expanded posters/abstracts. The Political and Information Economy Working Groups (GT5), Information Production and Communication in Science, Technology & Innovation (GT7), and Information and Technology (GT8) stood out in the topic output. The co-authorship networks displayed 180 actors oriented to open data, open government data, open innovation, academic social networks, data reuse and research data sharing. We also visualized a focus on topics dealing with scientific communication, the law on access to information, open science, access to information, open data, open access, information science, transparency, open government data, public information, public transparency, research data, among others. We concluded that Information Science makes substantial contributions to discussions on Open Science.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:prm:awjrnl:v:2:y:2021:p:e027
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://awari.pro-metrics.org/index.php/a/article/download/18/15
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prm:awjrnl:v:2:y:2021:p:e027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pro-Metrics Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://awari.pro-metrics.org/index.php/a .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.