Economic and social cohesion policy implementation in Hungary and Poland and its comparison to the conditions of the Czech Republic in programming period 2007-2013
The analysis of the economic and social cohesion policy implementation in Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic during the programming period 2007-2013 makes it possible to compare the approaches of these countries towards the implementation of this policy. Th e approach adopted by the Czech Republic seems to be only fragmental in comparison with the approaches of the other analyzed countries, both at the level of structure and content of the existing operational programmes and at the level of the roles of public administration (national and regional) in the preparations and management of these programmes. The fragmental approach of the Czech Republic could be seen for example at the number of the thematic (sector) operational programmes. The Czech Republic, which has all together 10 thematic operational programmes, while Hungary with comparable amount of structural funds resources only 8 and Poland with the allocation of structural funds three times higher than the Czech Republic only 5. Also the implementation structure of the Czech operational programmes seems to be more fragmental than the implementation structures of both Poland and Hungary. The number of institutions carrying out the obligations of the managing authority is higher in the Czech Republic than in the other two analyzed countries. Both in Hungary and Poland (with an exception of regional operational programmes) the single managing authority has been designated for all the operational programmes realized in programming period 2007-2013. Compared to the approaches of the Czech Republic with 14 different public authorities designated as managing authorities of one or more operational programmes, the approach of both Hungary and Poland makes it possible to increase the effi ciency of the programme management at the level of the single managing authority.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 2007 (2007)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: nam. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67 Praha 3|
Phone: (02) 24 09 51 11
Fax: (02) 24 22 06 57
Web page: http://www.vse.cz/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:|| Postal: Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, Katedra regionálních studií, nám. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67 Praha 3|
Web: http://www.regionalni-studia.cz/ Email:
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlrst:v:2007:y:2007:i:1:id:43:p:39-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Frantisek Sokolovsky)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.