IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlpol/vpreprintid1544.html

Two Approaches to Cyclical Adjustment of Fiscal Balances: The Case of Czechia

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Bárta

Abstract

This paper focuses on estimation of cyclically adjusted balance in Czechia with emphasis on period from 2010 onwards. The estimation is performed using two common approaches: Standard approach, known as OECD approach, uses the business cycle (output gap) as the relevant indicator of the cyclical position for each tax category. Alternative approach, known as ESCB approach, uses various macroeconomic variables and their respective cycles as relevant indicator for the cyclical adjustment. Therefore, each tax category is linked to the cycle of its own macroeconomic variable. In Czechia, the two approaches lead to different results which indicate the relevance of what the output gap is driven by and how the business cycle is reflected in wages, household consumption and profits. Given the tax system of Czechia, the cycle of wages and consumption is of particular importance. If the business cycle is driven by ups and downs of firms\\\' profits, the standard approach overestimates its impact on fiscal revenues. Conversely, if the economic growth or downturn is driven by wages and consumption, the standard approach underestimates its impact on fiscal revenues. In many years the cyclically adjusted balance estimated by alternative approach varies from standard approach between 0.2% to 0.5% GDP.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Bárta, . "Two Approaches to Cyclical Adjustment of Fiscal Balances: The Case of Czechia," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 0.
  • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:preprint:id:1544
    DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.1544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://polek.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.polek.1544.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.polek.1544?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:preprint:id:1544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.