IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlpol/vpreprintid1519.html

Public Environmental Attention and Corporate Greenwashing in China

Author

Listed:
  • Qizhi He
  • Maotao Liu
  • Xubing Fang
  • Najaf Iqbal

Abstract

Corporate greenwashing is increasingly posing a severe threat to the effective implementation and evaluation of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Apart from the regulatory pressure, the active participation of the public in environmental governance is essential in this regard. Through a theoretical and empirical lens, this study systematically examines the impact of public environmental attention (PEA) on corporate greenwashing and its underlying mechanism in the Chinese context. The data from A-share firms and the Baidu search index for prefecture-level cities are gathered from 2011 to 2020 and analyzed using 2SLS and various robustness tests. Results show that PEA can significantly suppress corporate greenwashing. The effect is more significant in high-polluting industries, regions with better rule of law, firms with non-political connections, and older executives with environmental backgrounds. Further analysis shows that PEA reduces greenwashing by inhibiting management's shortsighted behavior and increasing analysts' attention. Expanding the government's ecological concerns and strengthening environmental regulations enhance the inhibiting effect of PEA on greenwashing. The findings remain robust after a series of robustness and endogenous tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Qizhi He & Maotao Liu & Xubing Fang & Najaf Iqbal, . "Public Environmental Attention and Corporate Greenwashing in China," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 0.
  • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:preprint:id:1519
    DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.1519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://polek.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.polek.1519.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.polek.1519?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:preprint:id:1519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.