Author
Listed:
- Orhan Cengiz
- Fatma İdil Baktemur
Abstract
Oil rents (OR) have a significant role for oil-abundant countries; therefore, most oil-abundant countries depend on oil sectors. However, if gains from OR are not invested in the productive sectors, it may adversely affect long-term sustainable growth. As discussed in the relevant literature in the scope of the resource curse hypothesis (RCH) or Dutch disease, depending on natural resources (NR) may crowd out productive investment, resulting in decelerating economic growth (EG). However, crucial policies emerge that suggest that OR contributes to or dampens productivity in oil-rich countries. As it is observed that not many studies consider the role of OR on productive capacity, which is crucial for sustainable economic development. Therefore, the current study attempts to research the impacts of OR on productive capacity for a panel sample of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries from 2000 to 2021 by adopting spatial panel econometric techniques: the spatial autoregression (SAR) model, the spatial error model (SEM), and the spatial Durbin model (SDM).The empirical findings point out that despite OR having a negative impact on productive capacity in the GCC countries, there is no spatial effect on productive capacity. This result indicates that the change in OR in any member of the GCC does not spread to other members. Moreover, foreign direct investment (FDI) inward has positive local and spatial impacts on productive capacity. Although merchandise exports (EXP) have a positive spatial impact on productive capacity, there are no local effects. Finally, economic growth (EG) has negative local and spatial impacts on productive capacity. In line with empirical findings, some insightful policy implications can be offered that policymakers in the GCC countries should direct OR to productive investments to capture long-run sustainable development. Moreover, policymakers should encourage FDI in productive sectors.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:preprint:id:1498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.