IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlpol/v2002y2002i4id377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analýza a prognóza na základě modelů binární diskrétní volby
[The analysis and prediction using binary discrete choice models]

Author

Listed:
  • Roman Hušek
  • Jiřina Moravová

Abstract

In this paper probabilistic models have been proposed for learning and analysis about discrete choice behaviour. The first problem discussed in the article above is the specification and estimation of parameters of three models, the linear probability model and the nonlinear logit and probit models of binary choice. Some of the difficulties associated with the interpretation of the linear probability model suggest the usefulness of the nonlinear probability models. If only one or a few observations exist for each decisionmaker, maximum likelihood estimation is possible for the two models, logit and probit. When enough observations are available one can estimate the parameters of probit and logit models also by generalized least squares method. Given the availability of efficient computer packages (LIMDEP, RATS, GAUSS, SST, TSP) there are little differences in the computational effort of the two estimation methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Roman Hušek & Jiřina Moravová, 2002. "Analýza a prognóza na základě modelů binární diskrétní volby [The analysis and prediction using binary discrete choice models]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2002(4).
  • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:2002:y:2002:i:4:id:377
    DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://polek.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.polek.377.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.polek.377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:2002:y:2002:i:4:id:377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.