IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlpol/v2000y2000i1id104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Měnové výbory pro východní Evropu?
[Currency boards for eastern Europe?]

Author

Listed:
  • Antonín Rusek

Abstract

Feasibility of a currency board type of monetary arrangement in transitional economies of Eastern Europe is a function of the size of the country and the nature of the financial sector in a country. For very small countries where financial services can be provided by subsidiaries of foreign financial institutions the currency board is likely to be an optimal monetary arrangement. However, if the need exists for an efficient domestically based financial sector - as is likely in medium and large countries - the currency board type of arrangement appears unfeasible. Major reason is the need to restructure the domestic financial system in these countries. Such restructuring is costly and unlikely to be paid out of fiscal revenues. Hence, the need for Central Bank with its ability to create "net domestic assets" as the restructuring agent. However, once the transition is concluded and East European countries accession to EU becomes a serious possibility, a currency board arrangement appears to be a best intermediate monetary step before joining the Euro area.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonín Rusek, 2000. "Měnové výbory pro východní Evropu? [Currency boards for eastern Europe?]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2000(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:2000:y:2000:i:1:id:104
    DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://polek.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.polek.104.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.polek.104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:2000:y:2000:i:1:id:104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.