IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlpol/v1998y1998i3id235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vyjádření užitku přírodního statku metodou podmíněného hodnocení: případ snížení rizika záplav
[Contingent valuation analysis: benefit from risk reduction of floods]

Author

Listed:
  • Petr Šauer
  • Antonín Dvořák
  • Stanislava Mildeová
  • Jaroslava Mokrišová

Abstract

The solutions of ecological problems produced by human's activity claims for allocation of great volume of money. For the decision process it is necessary to evaluate a merits and costs associated with solution. The text deals with the problems of frequent floods in Frýdlant area, which are caused by facial colliery. The goal of paper is verifying whether the money dedicated to prevention against floods is increasing utility of economic subjects or not.

Suggested Citation

  • Petr Šauer & Antonín Dvořák & Stanislava Mildeová & Jaroslava Mokrišová, 1998. "Vyjádření užitku přírodního statku metodou podmíněného hodnocení: případ snížení rizika záplav [Contingent valuation analysis: benefit from risk reduction of floods]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 1998(3).
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:1998:y:1998:i:3:id:235
    DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://polek.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.polek.235.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.polek.235?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hana Švejdarová & Eva Cudlínová, 2013. "Economic Value of Cultural Landscape, Non-Production Services of a Territory, and Non-Market Valuation Methods. A Survey Focused on Determining which Landscape Functions are Valuated Most Frequently a," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2013(5), pages 64-81.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:1998:y:1998:i:3:id:235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.