K Rousseauově "teorii společenské smlouvy" z pohledu antropologicko-nomologického (ve srovnání s antropologicko-nomologickým pohledem na "teorii společenské smlouvy" Hobbesovu a Lockovu i v jiných srovnáních)

This study ("On Rousseau´s "theory of social contract" from the anthropological and nomological point of view (as compared with the antropological and nomological view of Hobbes´ and Locke´s "theory of social contract" and in other comparisons)") deals with that comparison as regards the concept of "natural law" (of human being), the concept of positive civil law (of human being in state and legal social form), some relation of positive civil law (of human being in state and legal social form) to "natural law" (of human being) as well as its validity (liability). - This study ("On Rousseau´s "theory of social contract" from the anthropological and nomological point of view (as compared with the anthropological and nomological view of Hobbes´ and Locke´s "theory of social contract" and in other comparisons)") demonstrates, as regards that comparison it deals with, that there is not any anthropological, ontological either nomological foundation of Rousseau´s "theory of social contract" in any aspect of that comparison, in contrast to Hobbes´ and Locke´s "theory of social contract" where some anthropological, ontological, and nomological foundation exists in all aspects of that comparison, as I have demonstrated in my prior studies on it.