IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlelg/v2012y2012i1id318p1-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pojetí přirozeného řádu u Locka a Rothbarda

Author

Listed:
  • Ondřej Kostka

Abstract

The focal point of this paper is the thought of two important theorists of the natural law and the natural rights - John Locke and Murray Rothbard. Its goal is to compare their ideas regarding the natural law. We can find the important agreement here, as in the case of giving reasons for the legitimity of private property, but differences as well. Locke and Rothbard differs from each other mainly in their view of state and its origin, what leads either to justification of state by Locke, or to emphatic rejection of it by Rothbard. Rothbard's conception is understood in this paper as the deduction of logical conclusions from Locke's premises.

Suggested Citation

  • Ondřej Kostka, 2012. "Pojetí přirozeného řádu u Locka a Rothbarda," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2012(1), pages 1-17.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2012:y:2012:i:1:id:318:p:1-17
    DOI: 10.18267/j.e-logos.318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.e-logos.318.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.e-logos.318.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.e-logos.318?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2012:y:2012:i:1:id:318:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.