IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlelg/v2008y2008i1id152p1-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pragmatism's Alternative to Foundationalism and Relativism

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Langseth

Abstract

In this paper I examine how pragmatism-in the works of Peirce, James, Dewey, and Rorty-rejects foundationalism while not resorting to "radical relativism," in which no is no justifiable claim for a belief. Instead of attempting to establish antecedent, a priori, or eternal principles that make evident truths, goods, or justifications thereof, independent of experience, pragmatists look towards the consequent, effective result of the maintaining of a belief as criteria for its claim as truthful or good. They emphasize trial and error experimentation and continual reflection/revision of beliefs given new information and experiences. I argue this basic methodology not only avoids the pitfalls of foundationalism, but also affords a method by which one considers the means or path towards any end as having value in and of itself.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Langseth, 2008. "Pragmatism's Alternative to Foundationalism and Relativism," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(1), pages 1-19.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2008:y:2008:i:1:id:152:p:1-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/artkey/elg-200801-0003.php
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/pdfs/elg/2008/01/03.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2008:y:2008:i:1:id:152:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.