IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Standards for more effective use of integrated system for risk management


  • Tatiana Varcholová
  • Lenka Dubovická


Application of Enterprise Risk Management system is nowadays considered as a major source of competitive advantage. Therefore, non-financial enterprises should review their current approaches to risk management. An important role is played by international norms and standards, providing a common system of terms, definitions of basic concepts and principles in order to harmonize and improve the quality of risk management processes in a global context. Article provides an overview of the most important and widely used standards, points to some practical aspects of their use, discusses their advantages and highlights the key constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana Varcholová & Lenka Dubovická, 2012. "Standards for more effective use of integrated system for risk management," Ekonomika a Management, University of Economics, Prague, vol. 2012(2), pages 41-48.
  • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnleam:v:2012:y:2012:i:2:id:166:p:41-48

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Shane Frederick, 2005. "Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 19(4), pages 25-42, Fall.
    2. Shapiro, Stewart & Spence, Mark T., 1997. "Managerial intuition: A conceptual and operational framework," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 63-68.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Risk management; Risk management standards; ISO 31000:2009; Manažment rizika; Štandardy manažmentu rizika; ISO 31000:2009;

    JEL classification:

    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnleam:v:2012:y:2012:i:2:id:166:p:41-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Frantisek Sokolovsky). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.