IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlaip/v2017y2017i2id108p174-187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Survey Results About University Students' Perception of Benefits of Supporting E-Learning Education
[Analýza výsledkov prieskumu vnímania prínosov podporného e-learningové vzdelávania univerzitných študentov]

Author

Listed:
  • Michal Stričík
  • Monika Čonková

Abstract

The paper deals with the analysis of the answers to the results of the questionnaire survey on the e-learning system used at the Faculty of Business Economics of the University of Economics in Bratislava with seat in Košice, used at the Faculty in Košice and the workplace in Michalovce. The results of the survey point to the fact that respondents appreciate the use of e-learning form of education compared to its classical form (78 % of respondents) and the possibility of studying at any time (64 % of respondents). Part of the survey was focused on the analysis of the areas in which students have learned to improve their skills and knowledge on the basis of working with the e-learning system. Improvements were felt by respondents mainly in the field of the subject, communication area and informatics. As part of e-learning, respondents particularly saw room for improvement in expanding the e-learning portal content, for example, by lectures, more volumes, and by compilation of study materials requiring inclusion of other subjects into the system. Proper use of e-learning education will help to increase the quality and competitiveness of the provision of education more effectively, thereby increasing the satisfaction of students and meeting their commitments to society.

Suggested Citation

  • Michal Stričík & Monika Čonková, 2017. "Analysis of the Survey Results About University Students' Perception of Benefits of Supporting E-Learning Education [Analýza výsledkov prieskumu vnímania prínosov podporného e-learningové vzdelávan," Acta Informatica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(2), pages 174-187.
  • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlaip:v:2017:y:2017:i:2:id:108:p:174-187
    DOI: 10.18267/j.aip.108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://aip.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.aip.108.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://aip.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.aip.108.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.aip.108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Asunka, 2017. "“We Had a Blast!”: An Empirical Affirmation of Blended Learning as the Preferred Learning Mode for Adult Learners," International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), IGI Global, vol. 9(3), pages 37-53, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlaip:v:2017:y:2017:i:2:id:108:p:174-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.