IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pop/trustp/v2y2025p201-210.html

Government as a platform for efficient and safe administrative processes in university management –a case study on administrative innovation at RheinMain University of Applied Sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Akhmad Yusuf ZUHDY

    (Department of Civil Infrastructure Engineering-ITS, Surabaya, Indonesia)

  • Totok SOEHARTANTO

    (Department of Instrumentation Engineering-ITS, Surabaya, Indonesia)

Abstract

This study investigates the relevance of platform-based models for universities as a distinct case within public administration. It highlights how specific organizational characteristics—such as institutional autonomy, complexity, and multi-stakeholder governance—present unique challenges for university management. The research explores to what exent platform models can help address these challenges while ensuring legal compliance and secure system architecture. The platform economy is described in the literature as a modular ecosystem that includes a platform core (e.g., digital infrastructure, authentication) and a periphery (e.g., external developers, enterprises). In the context of administration, the "Government as a Platform" model is often used as a reference, which emphasizes the opening of state IT systems and the provision of standardized interfaces to external actors. For the analysis of the security law aspects of the platform economy in the administration of university management tasks, an interdisciplinary approach is chosen that integrates both legal and information technology perspectives. The methodology combines literature review, case study analysis (university management HSRM) and the comparison of theoretical models from platform research.The application of the platform economy approach to administrative processes offers considerable potential for increasing efficiency and promoting innovation. At the same time, security requirements must be systematically integrated into the platform architecture. The findings provide higher education leaders and public sector IT strategists with a framework for adopting platform models to meet governance, innovation, and security demands in university administration. The analysis shows that successful implementation requires a combination of technical standardization, clear governance structures, and continuous risk monitoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Akhmad Yusuf ZUHDY & Totok SOEHARTANTO, 2025. "Government as a platform for efficient and safe administrative processes in university management –a case study on administrative innovation at RheinMain University of Applied Sciences," International Conference on Machine Intelligence & Security for Smart Cities (TRUST) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 2, pages 201-210, december.
  • Handle: RePEc:pop:trustp:v:2:y:2025:p:201-210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://scrd.eu/index.php/trust/article/view/756/788
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://scrd.eu/index.php/trust/article/view/756
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gawer, Annabelle, 2014. "Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1239-1249.
    2. Andreas Hein & Maximilian Schreieck & Tobias Riasanow & David Soto Setzke & Manuel Wiesche & Markus Böhm & Helmut Krcmar, 2020. "Digital platform ecosystems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(1), pages 87-98, March.
    3. Aurelia TURCAN & Lucia GUJUMAN & Tatiana COLESNICOV, 2025. "Digital Transformation in Education: ASEM Case Study and the Integration of Modern Technologies in the Learning Process," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 9(3), pages 67-80, May.
    4. Álvaro Rocha & Maria José Angélico Gonçalves & Amélia Ferreira Silva & Sandrina Teixeira & Rui Silva, 2022. "Leadership challenges in the context of university 4.0. A thematic synthesis literature review," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 214-246, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gawer, Annabelle & Harracá, Martín, 2025. "Inconsistent platform governance and social contagion of misconduct in digital ecosystems: A complementors perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(8).
    2. Matzner, Martin & Pauli, Tobias & Marx, Emanuel & Anke, Jürgen & Poeppelbuss, Jens & Fielt, Erwin & Gregor, Shirley & Sun, Ruonan & Hydle, Katja Maria & Aas, Tor Helge & Aanestad, Margunn & Gordijn, J, 2021. "Transitioning to Platform-based Services and Business Models in a B2B Environment," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 5(3), pages 143-162.
    3. Raimo, Nicola & L'Abate, Vitiana & Vitolla, Filippo & Salvi, Antonio & Petruzzella, Felice, 2026. "Closing the loop on forecasts: Circular economy disclosure via social media platforms and analyst forecast quality," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    4. Peng, Hui & Lu, Yaobin & Gupta, Sumeet, 2023. "Promoting value emergence through digital platform ecosystems: Perspectives on resource integration in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    5. Mosch, Philipp & Majocco, Philipp & Obermaier, Robert, 2023. "Contrasting value creation strategies of industrial-IoT-platforms – a multiple case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    6. Bejjani, Melissa & Göcke, Lutz & Menter, Matthias, 2023. "Digital entrepreneurial ecosystems: A systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    7. Grzegorz Baran & Aleksandra Berkowicz, 2021. "Digital Platform Ecosystems as Living Labs for Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Innovation: A Conceptual Model Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Asta Pundziene & Neringa Gerulaitiene & Sea Matilda Bez & Irène Georgescu & Christopher Mathieu & Jordi Carrabina-Bordoll & Josep Rialp-Criado & Hannu Nieminen & Alpo Varri & Susanne Boethius & Mark v, 2023. "Value capture and embeddedness in social-purpose-driven ecosystems," Post-Print hal-04147723, HAL.
    9. Martin Poniatowski & Hedda Lüttenberg & Daniel Beverungen & Dennis Kundisch, 2022. "Three layers of abstraction: a conceptual framework for theorizing digital multi-sided platforms," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 257-283, June.
    10. Pundziene, Asta & Gerulaitiene, Neringa & Bez, Sea Matilda & Georgescu, Irène & Mathieu, Christopher & Carrabina-Bordoll, Jordi & Rialp-Criado, Josep & Nieminen, Hannu & Varri, Alpo & Boethius, Susann, 2023. "Value capture and embeddedness in social-purpose-driven ecosystems. A multiple-case study of European digital healthcare platforms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    11. Rodrigo, Laura & Palacios, Miguel & Martínez-Corral, Alberto & Tafur, Javier, 2025. "Virtual virtuous cycles. Mapping value structure in digital platforms and online communities realms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    12. Alexander Gleiss & Marco Kohlhagen & Key Pousttchi, 2021. "An apple a day – how the platform economy impacts value creation in the healthcare market," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(4), pages 849-876, December.
    13. Compagnucci, Lorenzo & Spigarelli, Francesca & Sernani, Paolo & Frontoni, Emanuele & Seri, Paolo, 2025. "A systematic literature review of business-to-business platforms for the digital transformation of the manufacturing industry: taking stock and advancing through research," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    14. Münch, Christopher & Marx, Emanuel, 2022. "Supply ecosystems and the concept of resilience: A literature review," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Jahn, Carlos & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Changing Tides: The New Role of Resilience and Sustainability in Logistics and Supply Chain Management – Innovative Approaches for the Shift to a New , volume 33, pages 39-66, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    15. Fabian Schüler & Dimitri Petrik, 2023. "Measuring network effects of digital industrial platforms: towards a balanced platform performance management," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 863-911, December.
    16. Sebastian Hermes & Tobias Riasanow & Eric K. Clemons & Markus Böhm & Helmut Krcmar, 2020. "The digital transformation of the healthcare industry: exploring the rise of emerging platform ecosystems and their influence on the role of patients," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 1033-1069, November.
    17. Wu, Aiqi & Song, Di & Liu, Yihui, 2022. "Platform synergy and innovation speed of SMEs: The roles of organizational design and regional environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 38-53.
    18. Lohmer, Jacob & Birkel, Hendrik & Müller, Julian M., 2024. "The internet of value: Towards a definition, framework, and understanding of its sustainability implications," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    19. Claude Paraponaris, 2017. "Plateformes numériques, conception ouverte et emploi," Post-Print halshs-01614430, HAL.
    20. Schmück, Kilian & Schückes, Magnus & Gutmann, Tobias & Gassmann, Oliver, 2025. "Less trust, more truth: Implications and design choices for business models and platform ecosystems in the age of Web3," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:trustp:v:2:y:2025:p:201-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.