Author
Listed:
- Akhmad Yusuf ZUHDY
(Department of Civil Infrastructure Engineering-ITS, Surabaya, Indonesia)
- Totok SOEHARTANTO
(Department of Instrumentation Engineering-ITS, Surabaya, Indonesia)
Abstract
This study investigates the relevance of platform-based models for universities as a distinct case within public administration. It highlights how specific organizational characteristics—such as institutional autonomy, complexity, and multi-stakeholder governance—present unique challenges for university management. The research explores to what exent platform models can help address these challenges while ensuring legal compliance and secure system architecture. The platform economy is described in the literature as a modular ecosystem that includes a platform core (e.g., digital infrastructure, authentication) and a periphery (e.g., external developers, enterprises). In the context of administration, the "Government as a Platform" model is often used as a reference, which emphasizes the opening of state IT systems and the provision of standardized interfaces to external actors. For the analysis of the security law aspects of the platform economy in the administration of university management tasks, an interdisciplinary approach is chosen that integrates both legal and information technology perspectives. The methodology combines literature review, case study analysis (university management HSRM) and the comparison of theoretical models from platform research.The application of the platform economy approach to administrative processes offers considerable potential for increasing efficiency and promoting innovation. At the same time, security requirements must be systematically integrated into the platform architecture. The findings provide higher education leaders and public sector IT strategists with a framework for adopting platform models to meet governance, innovation, and security demands in university administration. The analysis shows that successful implementation requires a combination of technical standardization, clear governance structures, and continuous risk monitoring.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:trustp:v:2:y:2025:p:201-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.