IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pop/procee/v6y2018p235-255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Respectarea drepturilor procesuale la judecarea cauzei in lipsa inculpatului

Author

Listed:
  • Arina IALANJI

    (Școala doctorală de științe juridice, Universitatea de Stat din Republica Moldova)

Abstract

In this article we analyze this concept and limits the notion of fair trial in the light of European Court of Human Rights. As principles of judicial process to be guaranteed the defendant during trial of the case in his absence will be considered equality of arms, access to justice, administration and assessment of evidence. Will be analyzed situations that the European Court has described a state of affairs as interference by proceedings in absentia, failure to ensure the rights of the defendant in terms of the right to a fair trial is established that margin that exceeds the minimum allowable to qualify a situation as a violation of legal provisions. Will highlight the conditions laid down by national law for the decision of the court to be tried in absentia, where the possibility of ruling in absentia and actions to be executed by the court jointly with the accuser of State for a decision on the proceedings in the absence of the person. There will also be analyzed in terms of the European Convention on Human Rights and the practice field, rights and guarantees of a fair trial to be taken against the absent defendant at trial if the case tried in his absence.

Suggested Citation

  • Arina IALANJI, 2018. "Respectarea drepturilor procesuale la judecarea cauzei in lipsa inculpatului," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, vol. 6, pages 235-255, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:6:y:2018:p:235-255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/294/258
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/294
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Equity trial in absentia trial; evidence; criminal; court; reasoning in the judgment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:6:y:2018:p:235-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.