IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pop/procee/v4y2016p215-222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bottlenecks arising from ownership in urban planning process. Lessons from Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Dana ALEXANDRU

    (Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu)

Abstract

Despite many features being changed in the traditional urban spatial process during the post-communist transition, this article introduces three ways in which the property right has and could be perceived: as a social dimension, as a condition and as a territorialized concept. This article recognize the tension between urban planning process and property right caused by differing priorities but argue that every perspective requires tradeofss, that the balance will be affected by the culture in wich planning and property are embedded. Romania s spatial development in the context of EU integration is extremely sensitive and complex as is organically linked to the legal rules governing property. Therefore, the purpose is to shed new light on urban matters and also to reveal the effects and limits of planning process in the context of protecting ownership.

Suggested Citation

  • Dana ALEXANDRU, 2016. "Bottlenecks arising from ownership in urban planning process. Lessons from Romania," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, vol. 4, pages 215-222, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:4:y:2016:p:215-222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/247/210
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/247
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    spatial development; property right; territory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:4:y:2016:p:215-222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.