IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pop/procee/v12y2024p219-228.html

Innovative approach for assessment the interactions between inland and aquaculture fishery

Author

Listed:
  • Aram ARAKELYAN

    (Yerevan State University, Faculty of Economics and Management, Armenia)

  • Gayane GHUKASYAN

    (Yerevan State University, Faculty of Economics and Management, Armenia)

  • Nairuhi JRBASHYAN

    (Yerevan State University, Faculty of Economics and Management, Armenia)

  • Hayk BAGHDASARYAN

    (Yerevan State University, Faculty of Economics and Management, Armenia)

Abstract

The interconnection between inland fisheries and aquaculture is considered as the mean for the assessment of the contribution of aquacultural farms in total fish production of the state. To highlight this contribution the vector autoregression models are given. As the case studies fishery industries are considered for country with access to ocean resources and landlocked country. This approach allows to assess the contribution of aquaculture production in fishery industry of the state. The importance of inland fishery is noted and simultaneously the contribution of aquaculture production in total fishery industry is assessed.

Suggested Citation

  • Aram ARAKELYAN & Gayane GHUKASYAN & Nairuhi JRBASHYAN & Hayk BAGHDASARYAN, 2024. "Innovative approach for assessment the interactions between inland and aquaculture fishery," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 12, pages 219-228, september.
    • Handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:12:y:2024:p:219-228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/693/726
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/693
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vlad Rosca & Raluca Ignat, 2014. "The Sustainability of Fish Consumption in Romania: Customer Behaviour prior and after the Country`s Adherence to the EU," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(35), pages 243-243, February.
    2. Mihaela PILA & Silvius STANCIU, 2022. "Fisheries and Aquaculture in Romania. Market Overview," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 251-256.
    3. Vasile Dinu, 2012. "Consumers’ Education and Information from the Perspective of Their Awareness and Ecological Behaviour," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(31), pages 5-6, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Codruţa Mare & Simona Laura Dragoş & Dan Tudor Lazăr & Cristian Mihai Dragoş, 2013. "Consumer protection through prices: an analysis of the energetic sector in European Union countries," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(34), pages 327-341, June.
    2. Ljiljana Kontic & Jovan Kontic, 2012. "Sustainability and Readiness for Change: Insights from a Banking Case Study in Serbia," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(32), pages 537-548, June.
    3. Vlad Rosca & Raluca Ignat, 2014. "The Sustainability of Fish Consumption in Romania: Customer Behaviour prior and after the Country`s Adherence to the EU," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(35), pages 243-243, February.
    4. Viorel Avram & Daniela Artemisa Calu & Valentin Florentin Dumitru & Tatiana Danescu, 2019. "The Clarity of the Information Regarding the Bioeconomy: An Analysis of the Reports Published by the Organizations," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 1-41, February.
    5. Mihaela Kardos & Manuela Rozalia Gabor & Nicoleta Cristache, 2019. "Green Marketing’s Roles in Sustainability and Ecopreneurship. Case Study: Green Packaging’s Impact on Romanian Young Consumers’ Environmental Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, February.
    6. Gabriela Prelipcean & Mircea Boscoianu, 2014. "Stochastic Dynamic Model on the Consumption – Saving Decision for Adjusting Products and Services Supply According with Consumers` Attainability," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(35), pages 201-201, February.
    7. Mirela Stoian & Dan Boboc, 2014. "A study on perspectives of organic farming and organic food market," International Conference on Competitiveness of Agro-food and Environmental Economy Proceedings, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 3, pages 143-153.
    8. Nicolae Lupu & Mihail Ovidiu Tanase & Remus-Alexandru Tontoroiu, 2013. "A straightforward x-ray on applying the ecolabel to the hotel business area," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(Special 7), pages 634-644, November.
    9. Eduard Madalin Dinu & Cecilia Nicoleta Jurcut & Delia Anca Gabriela Gligor & Irina Daniela Cismasu & Alexandru Buglea, 2025. "Integrating Digital Technologies to Enhance ESG Performance: A Focus on Central and Eastern European Countries," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(70), pages 903-903, August.
    10. Šárka Velcovská & Tomáš Sadílek, 2014. "The System of the Geographical Indication – Important Component of the Politics of the Consumers` Protection in European Union," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(35), pages 228-228, February.
    11. Cristina Ganescu & Andreea Gangone & Mihaela Asandei, 2014. "Assessing the Impact of the National Cultural Framework on Responsible Corporate Behaviour towards Consumers: an Application of Geert Hofstede`s Cultural Model," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(35), pages 351-351, February.
    12. Yuriy Bilan, 2013. "Sustainable development of a company: building of new level relationship with the consumers of XXI century," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(Special 7), pages 687-701, November.
    13. repec:aud:audfin:v:21:y:2019:i:50:p:41 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Emese Tokarcikova & Alzbeta Kucharcikova & Patricia Janosova, 2022. "The Relationship between Environmental and Economic Aspects for Measuring the Sustainability of the Enterprise: A Case Study of Slovak Manufacturing Enterprises," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-13, June.
    15. Camelia I. Lungu & Cornelia Dascalu & Chirata Caraini & Erica C. Balea, 2014. "Econometric Approach of the Scenarios regarding the Impact of the Consumer’s Empowerment and Companies’ Responsibility for Environment Sustainability on the Electricity Market Performance," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(35), pages 187-187, February.
    16. Jaroslaw Korpysa, 2013. "Buyer behaviour in the context of sustainable consumption policy pursued in Poland," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(Special 7), pages 702-713, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:12:y:2024:p:219-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.