IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pop/journl/v3y2019i2p9-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smart comprehension - Comparing three smart cities from three Middle European countries

Author

Listed:
  • Marcell Laszlo TOTH

    (Szechenyi Istvan University, Gyor, Hungary)

Abstract

The topic of smart city is very actual and popular today. This is an urban development and management mode, what using the infocommunication technologies and smart devices and solutions, to made the city more effective, more environmental-friendly and more liveable for the citizens. However, there are big differences in smart city point of view between counties, regions and cities. In this study the chosen cities was compared across their smart city situation. These three are the following: Bratislava (Slovakia), Graz (Austria) and Gyor (Hungary). The author analyze the strategic document, look at the working smart solutions from the cities, and find results about the three analyzed cities. The conclusion is that Graz is smarter than the other two cities, but Bratislava and Gyor have good opportunities to catch up the European average. Graz could be a good pattern for this cities, both of them can learn from Austrian cities, if they want to reach their goal, and become the smartest city from their own country.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcell Laszlo TOTH, 2019. "Smart comprehension - Comparing three smart cities from three Middle European countries," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, vol. 3(2), pages 9-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:pop:journl:v:3:y:2019:i:2:p:9-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://scrd.eu/index.php/scrd/article/view/52/45
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://scrd.eu/index.php/scrd/article/view/52
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    smart city; urban development; sharing economy; comprehension;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:journl:v:3:y:2019:i:2:p:9-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.